Plato’s view on democracy is flawed because it has no connection to modern ideals. The deposed demonstration is a party in the eastern sense, or the class that comes from the verb daiomai. This understanding does not include the notion of ‘person’. ‘
The only difference to the oligarchy is the small size of the oligarchs. These are smaller than sports teams along with their training staff. This elite oligarchy is like a native America that he comes back to. The Romans who were later known as res publica (avoidance) are the most prominent in Greek cities. Athens’ political acts are described as a collection, or perhaps more than, of selfish interests that make up 2 or 3% of Attica’s adult male population. Plato did not discuss democracy in his works. He cannot be accused of criticizing something that he didn’t imagine. Criticizing Jefferson’s opposition to Marxist Socialism is an anachronism. We can only assume that Jefferson would be horrified by such exposure. Plato didn’t realize that Athens’s system of democracy allowed privileges to be determined not by the nature and positive character of a person, such as concern about truth and not just for personal gain. However, the condo entitles the owner to decide. Plato’s democracy can be seen as a result of an oligarchy government losing its original aim to reform or structure society in accordance with the project. (The Greek arches refer to the creative aspect, while kratos only refers to a strict dominion of limiting interest) This is contrary to idealist development. Plato’s alternative republican government is called tomokratsiya. Some may call it meritocracy. The Athens model has equal rights to moral and intellectual abilities, while others are more likely to inherit them. Philosophers will use the power to make better decisions, namely those who spend most of their time studying and improving, and then by caregivers who believe they have an interest and can help them to become military officers. Third, he will be trained not by the owner but by the fourth-level mechanics and the owner. It was a caste system that was ideal and resembled Indian philosophers. Grafting and lobbying without ever being able to confirm their existence.
